[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Framers2 <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Are Adobe's wheels coming off?
From: Douglas Metcalfe-White <dougmw@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 07:41:54 -0800
Organization: IMS
References: <2.2.16.19991117144501.0ebf185a@pop.primenet.com> <01d101bf316b$cf13b460$69dacdcf@carmen> <l03130302b459b98f4265@[155.229.116.112]>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
I agree. We are a UNIX house and our group has already abandoned FM for HTML when it comes to online help. We are just starting to look at moving to XML for document production. I expect that sometime in the next two years we will complete the shift and abandon FM entirely. Don't get me wrong, I like FM. However, times and needs (and support, it seems) are changin'. If FM doesn't meet our publishing needs we'll find a product that can. Doug Larry Kollar wrote: > > ezra wrote: > > > An additional insult added to this injury is Adobe's decision to drop > > Acrobat support on UNIX (other than the Reader). This makes tatters of > > any effort to use PDF in the document creation/revision/edit/publish > > company workflow in a cross-platform environment that includes UNIX. > Someone else in this thread said they're using HTML for their online > format now. XML is now viable for many applications. And while many > people have Acrobat Reader, almost *everybody* has a web browser. > > If Adobe wants our business, regardless of our platform of choice, > they will listen. If they don't want our business, there are plenty > of alternatives (and I'm not talking about Microslobber). ====================================================== Douglas Metcalfe-White Senior Technical Writer ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **