[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "'Chris Seal'" <cseal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Framers List'" <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: FM graphics display problem
From: "Debbi Fortney" <debbi.fortney@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:00:29 -0800
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <LISTMANAGER-68809-17774-2002.02.21-09.59.59--debbi.fortney#verizon.net@lists.raycomm.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
The only way I know of to accomplish this is to place a separate text frame on the page, and place the table inside that text frame. You can then set Runaround Properties for the text flow. However, the table is not anchored in anyway to the text; unless this is a very small document you will end up with a maintenance nightmare since the table won't move if you add text above it. Putting the table in an anchored frame will give you the same results you describe below. Debbi Fortney Technical Trainer/Consultant Adobe Certified Expert, FrameMaker & Photoshop Bothell, WA 98011 425-482-2617 debbi.fortney@verizon.net Chris Seal wrote: > This may be all well and good for single-column documents. I > had a horrible time with a two-column layout. Graphics have > runaround properties, whereas I could not find how to > configure runaround properties for tables (is it possible?). > > So if there was a table halfway down the page, and it was > wider than a column, the text flowed down the first column to > the table, then up to the top of the second column, then > under the table the text continued in the first column then > over to the second column. > > I had thought about putting an anchored frame in a table > cell, then putting the table in an anchored frame then .. . ... > > Chris Seal <big snip of previous posts> ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **