[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Art Campbell" <art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Censorship alive and well on frameusers
From: "Stevens, Martha \(ISSAtlanta\)" <MStevens@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:09:16 -0500
Cc: "Bill Briggs" <web@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcXvpM9JycZcXnayQumG2FxLNmMeJQAsuGPQ
Thread-topic: Censorship alive and well on frameusers
Based on the political terrain here, I had assumed that all the key players would be on both lists. Sorry, also, for posting the entire digest by accident before. However, I will point out that there are plenty of moderated lists where that is the annoying norm, so whoever commented that no moderator would pass *that* is incorrect. I'll offer MHO on one other part of this thread, and then sign off. Infrastructure issues are NOT off topic for any list because of their potentially significant impact on the users of the list. I agree with whoever it was that said that Lisa should have handled it differently. I should just start pressing Delete, but the train wreck effect is at work. -----Original Message----- From: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Art Campbell Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:23 PM To: Stevens, Martha (ISSAtlanta) Cc: Bill Briggs; framers@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Censorship alive and well on frameusers Martha, I think you'd have to email the moderator of the other list that we're talking about, based at framers.com, to find out. ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **