[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Censorship alive and well on frameusers
From: Art Campbell <art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:03:39 -0500
Cc: "hedley.finger@xxxxxxxx" <hedley.finger@xxxxxxxx>, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rKq8hULSaFdp9uS9G8hX1BJOu3vnF37Ni1nWf0Eng/lHM2WJiiS9j7wdW/1F2LWM4J2RxRUHxrEftQBsHpvi8WgWk9T7ofK5H7qIeBCidoQeKQdibw+1Zkpzn9Kyb18sXLygz1bxcB39yF/cRE9V24BCJdunm8NnabdPjeXcnD4=
In-reply-to: <vq15o1phqfit4un1c3itlfg2nn1vc8g7qr@4ax.com>
References: <OF19D8B373.76FE8DEF-ONCA2570C1.0007E2BF-CA2570C1.000A4E45@myob.com.au> <c7d9dd600511211803y19fa0683r53c8e71e8ac67d5d@mail.gmail.com> <vq15o1phqfit4un1c3itlfg2nn1vc8g7qr@4ax.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
On 11/21/05, Jeremy H. Griffith <jeremy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:03:15 -0500, Art Campbell > <art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >As much as I admire your spirit... framers is a privately owned commercial > >list, and the owners are the owners. > > WRONG, Wrong, wrong! It is not, never has been, and never > will be, any more than the ANWR is owned by the oil companies. > The original framers was a community list that predated the > takeover by Brad by many years; I was on it back when it was > hosted on uunet. Brad did not buy the list, because there > was no-one to buy it from. The *only* other way one can own > a list is to start it from scratch, asking people to opt-in. > Brad never did that. Ergo, he never owned it. Simple truth. In theory I agree. I was on hte uunet list too. However, the theory ain't the reality. The "other list" is operated under the "possession is 9/10ths of the law," maxim. And if it actually came to a court case, they'd have a solid case for ownership. <anip> > >As they say in the US (well, some of us say): > >"Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one." > >A. J. Liebling > > Fortunately, the Web has changed that again. ;-) > > >And censorship works very well; your message wouldn't have gotten through > >if there hadn't been another "press" available. (Thanks, Jeremy!) > > Which is why there is another press, and always will be, one > that will *never* be commercial. I don't "own" it, the whole > community does; I'm the current listadmin, that's all. If I > no longer want to run it, or if enough members want someone > else to do that (as a volunteer), I'll pass it on cheerfully. > > >And Mailman... I think it's a great little program. Open source. Free. > >Maybe the archiving isn't as good as Yahoo's, but you don't have the > >penalty of having your address broadcast either. > > <sigh> A few years ago I thought it looked good, too, and > tried to move Free Framers to it. No good. It just won't > scale; a couple hundred users strains it, and I have no > idea how Lisa can manage with the frameusers list on it. > The trouble is, it's written in interpreted Python... So > far, I've found no real working substitute for majordomo, > and I'd dearly love to find one... Probably time to look at it again, Jeremy. I'm helping run a three-list Mailman server that's running 1300, 700, & 350 member lists without breaking a sweat. And a separate install of another list that's >300 members. No problems. And because of the user interface, the user accounts are largely self-maintaining. ;- ) Art -- Art Campbell art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson No disclaimers apply. DoD 358 ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **