[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Bill Briggs <web@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FrameMaker UI
From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:41:34 -0400
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mc5v9y5UIiS0WAhnOr1/mKHQcrgjS4qUYTQyWtWLO7ym212lBMun/9lf+saa+olmcLkN/X1HypGnzQupycAkkAph+CnUPEC426BdQOMDy9Lo/o/3K/OWbNqHo74K2y17kMclVFmjAjs+oatc+Jafn1vC2ll4P4xa3FJ40qnfrb0=
In-reply-to: <p0611043cbecaacdca025@131.202.8.59>
References: <6488832.1118093367414.JavaMail.root@wamui-rustique.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <p0611043cbecaacdca025@131.202.8.59>
Reply-to: Bill Swallow <techcommdood@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
> Indeed it is subjective. If you want "sex appeal", try your local > night club. Something I manifestly DON'T want is change for the sake > of change. I can think several changes I would make to FrameMaker, > but not much has anything to do with the look of the UI. At 48 with > four young children I often look tired when I go in to work, but none > of the young and sexy looking students I teach can come close to what > I can do in the class or the lab, so it's not all about how you look. You gotta admit that dockable style, drawing, equation, and structure windows would be better than the positionable-only ones. Other than that, yeah, I see little UI enhancements being a big bang for the buck. > I've never been a fan of this. Never missed it in FrameMaker. Would > far rather have access to cross-reference marker text, more flexible > system variables, or something else useful. We must have been separated at birth. ;-) ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **