[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Stuart Burnfield" <stuartb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: new system OS ???
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:49:59 -0800
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <NDBBKGGOHBHIJJOJNBLMEEHHDFAA.stuartb@tpg.com.au>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Stuart, Windows XP "Home" is "dumbed down" from the "Pro" version in several ways: (1) You can only access a subset of the file management / security features with the "Home" version. (2) Capabilities associated with networking with domains and Active Directory are missing or severely restricted. Thus, your ability to put together a small network of carefully managed computers is highly restricted with the "Home" edition, even more so than with Windows'9x/Me. (3) I am told that a number of other system management utilities are missing in the "Home" edition. The base operating system is the same, but you lose quite a bit of flexibility to subsequently become part of a larger network of computers, if necessary. Understand that my 34 years in the "bizz" tend to make me somewhat of a picky, demanding, power user. As such, I wouldn't touch the "Home" edition with a ten foot pole. Having said that, for most personal purposes other than networking, I would certainly not dispute that XP Home is orders of magnitude "better" than Windows'9x/Me in terms of stability. - Dov At 2/21/2002 12:43 AM, Stuart Burnfield wrote: >Hi Dov - > >> My personal recommendation is to go to preferably Windows 2000 >> Professional (if you can still find it) or otherwise Windows XP >> Professional (the "Home" version is dumbed down). > >Can you say in what ways XP Home is dumbed down? I run 98 SE, which >is adequate, but a more stable OS that runs NT-family apps would be >very attractive. > >Based on my not-very-indepth reading, I pictured XP Pro as the >business/server version, and XP Home as the SOHO/workstation edition. >I thought Home basically ran the same apps as Pro but lacked some >scalability, networking and workgroup features. From your mail it >sounds like there's more to it than that. > >Would you say XP Home is a maybe a little lightweight for a SOHO >with a couple of networked PCs and a standard Frameish workflow >(Frame/MS Office/graphics/PDF/print/scan/burn, etc.)? > >Please feel free to reply to the list if you think the answer would >be of general interest. > >Regards >--- >Stuart Burnfield ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **