[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
Subject: Re: typographical name for the # symbol
From: "Dave Reynolds" <dave.reynolds@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 09:00:26 +1200
Organization: Tait Electronics Ltd
References: <3cfabfae.3629153887@smtp.omsys.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Thomas and Roger wrote: > Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 13:16:16 +0200 > From: "Thomas Michanek" <thomas.michanek@telia.com> > Subject: Re: typographical name for the # symbol > > *** The original message appeared on the FrameUsers mailing list. > *** This reply is copied only to the framers@omsys.com mailing list. > > From: "Roger Jones" <Roger.Jones@rjpc.demon.co.uk> > > I am seeking the proper typographical name for the # symbol. I've seen it > > called: > > * crosshatch > > * hash > > * number > > * pound > > * sharp > > * octothorpe. > > > > None of these seems entirely convincing as a typographical term (cf. > > ampersand), the last in the list being a telephone-industry invention of > > relatively recent years. > > All of the above are more or less commonly used names for the '#' sign, > but from a typographical standpoint, the name "sharp" is incorrect, as this > is a musical symbol that have a different appearance (glyph, if you like). > Names like "number" and "pound" reflects the *context* or *usage*, > not the appearance. "crosshatch" refers to the appearance. I'm not sure > where the name "hash" comes from. > "Hash" is common usage down here. For example, I use telephone banking regularly and it is referred to as the hash key in the automated verbal instructions. Dave -- /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Dave Reynolds Phone (64) (3) 358 1029 Senior Technical Author Fax (64) (3) 358 3520 Tait Electronics Ltd Email: dave.reynolds@tait.co.nz PO Box 1645 Christchurch New Zealand ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **