[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Despot <despot@xxxxxxxxxx>, <edunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "J.G. Blom" <j.g.blom@xxxxxxxxx>, <Framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Yikes...no FrameMaker?
From: Dan Emory <danemory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 23:26:45 -0800
In-Reply-To: <B6A4F953.9C3%despot@bluewin.ch>
References: <852569EA.006A5789.00@btg_hub01.bombardier.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
At 01:26 AM 2/6/01 +0100, Despot wrote: >Right. By the way, can anyone say what WE are doing exactly ? I'm using FM >for fine books, journals, newsletters, illustrated albums, catalogs, ads, >private letters and diary, literary writing, website building, pc-mac >exchange, logotype design and database publishing. And I have not attended a >single hour of training as a programmer, DTP designer or techwriter. My only >skill was to choose the right tool at the start. I can't imagine doing all >that with, say, QuarkXPress. Or anything else for that matter. I too do alot of database publishing, using UniMerge and FrameMaker. By moving to FrameMaker+SGML, you get all the features of ordinary FrameMaker, PLUS structured document authoring that is compliant with a DTD, AND the capability to export those documents to either SGML or XML. FrameMaker+SGML is truly the Swiss Knife of the Publishing business (it still needs some tweaks to make it better), yet it is not a god-awful resource hog like Word and other DTPs with only half of Frame's capabilities. > > If a better one comes along, we'll switch > >...of course, and spend months learning other environment, other shortcuts, >other methods, other conceptions, other troubles. Spend a fortune buying >other licenses, other plug-ins... Exactly the point. The investment in time alone to switch to something else, acquire the necessary add-ons, and then become proficient in in that new environment is a huge cost factor that none of us want to contemplate. >I apologise if this looks somewhat off-topic. I just meant to say that when >a thing is good and well fitted to its purpose, it is always a pity to see >it fall off. Even when you can easily switch to something newer and >virtually better. Which, if you're currently exploiting all of Frame's capabilities, as I am, is the reciprocal of "easily switch." I suspect, however, that the only way to convince Adobe that there's still enough of us out there to keep the product profitable and viable is to religiously purchase each new release. ==================== | Nullius in Verba | ==================== Dan Emory, Dan Emory & Associates FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory@primenet.com 10044 Adams Ave. #208, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 ---Subscribe to the "Free Framers" list by sending a message to majordomo@omsys.com with "subscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **