[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Kay Maitra <kay.maitra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tracking numbers in a graphic
From: edunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:29:59 -0500
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
It would seem to me that if the CAD drawings are produced by another department, and the parts list is autogenerated, that you shouldn't do anything. This is even more so considering the volume of figures and lists. What needs investigated is not how FM can check numbers, but how the drawings and lists are produced in the first place. The engineering/CAD process must be set up to provide you with drawings and parts lists at the same revision level and verified by engineering. Any post processing the publications department does may be well meaning, but is covering for someone else's mistake. If liability arises from inaccurate data, this opens the publications to scrutiny instead of engineering or the process used to gather engineering information. This may make no difference as to who pays, but it does make it difficult to ensure the correct part of the process is corrected so the situation does not reproduce. Anyway, any solution that checks after the fact can only check if the numbers in the parts list are present in the illustration (not something frame could do, but scripts could accomplish). Suck a script could never tell if number 46 in the list and number 46 in the illustration are both screws. Eric L. Dunn ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **