[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Michael Cudmore <mcudmore@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Equation differences between AdobePS versions
From: "Dov Isaacs" <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 16:27:51 -0800
Cc: Framers List <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, The Other Framers <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <3A2C1C15.C85B48B5@neap.com.au>
References: <sa2774fd.003@mspeos0.corp.medtronic.COM><4.3.2.7.2.20001204070118.0200ce20@mail-303.corp.adobe.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Michael, Nothing to ever apologize about. These forums are about the exchange of ideas and solutions. Sometimes we are "right" about our hunches and our descriptions; sometimes "less right." In either case, we must allow each other the latitude to "miss" once in a while ... Virtually all of this is done via educated guess based upon experience. (8^)> - Dov At 12/4/2000 02:35 PM, Michael Cudmore wrote: >Dov, > >I may yet owe you an apology; it is possible that I made the PDFs >which had the spacing problems using the Laserjet printer instance, >rather than Distiller. I had installed both printer instances but I am >not sure that I used them both for their intended purposes when >testing. > >Under normal circumstances I do make sure to switch manually to >Distiller as the active printer, then print to PS and distill from a >watched folder. However it is possible that after I had seen the text >spacing problems on screen in FrameMaker and when printed directly to >the Laserjet 4, I departed from my checklist and fired off a few quick >PDFs with the Laserjet printer still active. > >I will now investigate whether, with Distiller as the active printer, >the spacing problems appear onscreen in FrameMaker and in PDF. I am >hopeful that using the Distiller, and reinstalling the Laserjet >printer instance from a modified PPD will solve the problem. Dov, I am >sorry if I have wasted your time, and I will let you and the lists >know if problems remain after further testing under the known reliable >conditions. > >Dov Isaacs wrote: >> >> Michael, >> >> Given that the PPD for Acrobat 3 is for a 2017 printer, the PPD >> hack isn't going to help. The problem is with the driver's interpretation >> of PPDs with a PostScript version < 2015. (That is why I made a guess >> about your use of the LaserJet 4 printer instance.) If for some reason, >> you are using a very ancient PPD for Acrobat 3 PostScript generation >> (such as the PPD for Acrobat 2 or 2.1), then the PPD hacking would help. >> Keep me in the loop as to what you find, please. >> >> - Dov > >-- >Michael Cudmore ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **