[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [New search]
Subject: Re: Safe graphics format x-platform x-application
From: jeremy@xxxxxxxxx (Jeremy H. Griffith)
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 15:41:43 GMT
Organization: Omni Systems, Inc.
On Fri, 23 Oct 1998 16:18:27 +0200 (MET DST), Thomas Michanek <email@example.com> wrote: >I don't agree with TIFF being the best format for multiple platforms. >The problem is that there are so many different versions of the >TIFF format that you have to test extensively with your graphics >software and FM on all platforms to be certain it will work. I have to agree with Thomas. If you read the TIFF spec, there are so many different variations permitted that no one package ever could support them all. The problem is that the spec does not define subsets, so each developer chooses for themselves; chaos is the result. >In our UNIX and Windows NT experience, GIF is a cross-platform >format that gives very few problems. As much as I dislike the Unisys patent on GIF (actually, on the form of LZW compression it uses), I too have to recommend it. Among the bitmap formats FrameMaker supports, only two work with the WinHelp compiler: DIB (.bmp, also used within .wmfs) and GIF (undocumented, but works well for WinHelp 4). And of these, only GIF works with HTML for all browsers; few support DIB. So if you want to use the same graphic for all forms of on-line help, as well as for print, GIF is really your only choice. -- Jeremy H. Griffith, at Omni Systems Inc. (firstname.lastname@example.org) http://www.omsys.com/ ** To subscribe to Free Framers, email the message ** ** body "subscribe framers" to email@example.com ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **