[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
Subject: RE: Encore: draft of posting protocol
From: Ezra Steinberg <Ezra.Steinberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 12:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
This also has my vote. FrameMaker work also exists in a "global economy", i.e. we integrate (have to) with a wide variety of tools to get the job done. Ezra ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ezra Steinberg Resonate, Inc. Human Factors Engineer 465 Fairchild Drive, Suite 115 Senior Technical Writer Mountain View, CA 94043 http://www.resonate.com USA Voice: 650.967.6500, x129 FAX: 650.967.6561 > I agree. I think if any other sw (tools/utils, plug-ins, WebWorks, > PhotoShop, etc.) is used in our FM-oriented process, then it should be > allowed in the discussion. > > R > > -----Original Message----- > From: Debbi Leipold [SMTP:debbi@diehlgraphsoft.com] > Sent: Friday, October 02, 1998 1:38 PM > To: Free Framers > Subject: RE: Encore: draft of posting protocol > > I would also like to suggest that we can discuss some of these related > topics on this list. There are many occassions where something started > in > frame but ended up somewhere else. For example, used frame to webworks > for > on-line help. Are webworks questions ok? Then used javascript to > enhance > the html. having some problems. Is it Frame, Webworks, or the script. > I > personally think thse types of threads are useful for most of us. > > > ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** > ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **