[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Fred Ma <fma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Get FM stop to asking to save unchanged file
From: Chuck Hastings <cwh2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:41:48 -0700
References: <3EE70AC9.F63C71C9@doe.carleton.ca> <3EE77C63.6000FD0D@doe.carleton.ca>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Hello Again Fred, My email, sent in haste before my 45-mile morning commute of the day, omitted one important key point about Modus Operandi, which to me gets most of the way around your objection to relying on `Revert to Saved.' What I actually do is to invoke `Revert to Saved' not only at the END of my session with some file, but WHENEVER I've just made some change to that file which I'm sure is NOT a content change, when I'm through with needing that change to be in effect. (This M.O. can also go along with saving promptly after any serious content changes.) Thus, all NON-content changes get expeditiously undone. If that little bottom-of-the-screen asterisk next to the page count is on when I'm ready to close up the file, I know that there's been a content change and that I need to do a save. The only problem then comes if I slack off and keep a bunch of non-content changes in effect, while also making content changes . . . Usually I don't do that. Nothing in life comes entirely without cost. I should note that `Revert to Save' is a very fast and convenient operation. By the way, even changing the viewing scale factor from say 100% to 120% turns on that little asterisk! I've set up another recourse also — setting the autosave Preference to autosave every two minutes. Probably sounds paranoid, but it's occasionally been vital when I got ahead of myself while editing some file. Chuck Hastings cwh2@earthlink.net ========================================= Fred Ma wrote: > Fred Ma wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > My post seems to have gotten lost enroute again.... > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: Get FM stop to asking to save unchanged file > > Date: 11 Jun 2003 02:20:11 -0700 > > From: fma@doe.carleton.ca (fred ma) > > Organization: http://groups.google.com/ > > Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker,comp.text.frame > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there a way to get FM to not ask to save > > a file on exitting, if the file has not been > > changed? It is the only app to do this, so > > I usually pause and say "Wait a minute...did > > I change something? I don't want to lose it." > > Most of the time, it's just not worth the > > trouble to save it under a different name and > > compare documents with the original. Instead, > > I just say "yes" to save the file. But this > > changes the time stamp. I rely on the time > > stamp as a sanity check to see which copies I > > have on different machines is the most recent > > (I archive my files and transfer them from > > machine to machine depending on my location). > > So by saving a few minutes by saying "yes" to > > saving the file, I waste quite a few *more* > > minutes scratching my head and figuring out > > the most recent file, without trusting the > > time stamps. Been going on for years. > > > > Fred > > Thanks, all, for your suggestions. > > Regarding David's suggestion, I don't want to turn > off updating, I just want to know when real > changes have been made. But I would be interested > on where the archive of recent postings can be > searched. > > So it looks like I cannot avoid that save message > if I want to be able to browse the document on a > different computer from the one on which it was > generated, unless I save it in view- only. > > Regarding Becky's suggestion, I did a search on > Document Info, and it seems to apply to the > generation of PDF documents. I'm not sure how > it can help in my case, but perhaps I missed the > point. > > Regarding Chuck's suggestion, reverting-to-saved > is like saying no to saving the file. I prefer > not to do this unless I'm sure that the changes > are not content changes. > > I realize I can get the exact time-stamps on > solaris on windows (I use cygwin, since I'm more > familiar with unix). In order to trust the > meaningfulness of the time stamp, I have to avoid > saves when the document changes are not content > changes. Otherwise, a slightly obsolete draft may > have a more recent timestamp. > > Thanks again for the suggestions. > > Fred > -- > Fred Ma, fma@doe.carleton.ca > Carleton University, Dept. of Electronics > 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario > Canada, K1S 5B6 > > ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** > ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **