[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Free Framers" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>, "FrameSGML List" <FrameSGML@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ANN: DocFrame 1.0 for FrameMaker 7
From: DW Emory <danemory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:51:27 -0800
In-Reply-To: <LISTMANAGER-118537-40374-2003.02.07-12.32.15--danemory#globalcrossing.net@lists.FrameUsers.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
I'm intrigued (perhaps a better word is puzzled) by Sriptorium's new offering of its DocFrame structured document license package. I took a look at the sample document (PDF) on the Scriptorium website, which was purportedly created from the DocFrame EDD. If that sample document is intended to show the EDD's full structured capabilities, then the documents producible by using it would have a distinctly bland, plain-vanilla flavor that lacks the kind of robust structure needed for complex technical documentation. In fact, although Scriptorium's description of DocFrame does not explicitly state that its main purpose is to produce HTML and HTML help from XML output, that does appear to be its only useful capability. And if that's all it's good for, why does Scriptorium think anyone would be willing to shell out $3125 for a 5-pack (a Developer's license plus 5 "Author" licenses) when you could buy the same capability for much less by sticking with unstructured Frame documents and using one copy of MIF2GO to produce the desired outputs of XML, HTML, and HTML help, and much more? What I think DocFrame was actually intended to be was a very simple structured document application suitable mainly for classroom training, as evidenced by the inclusion in the license package of Scriptorium's "complete FrameMaker Workbook series," plus the DocFrame Author's and Developer's Guides. For training purposes, I think Scriptorium has a great package, but its usefulness for actual production of real technical documents would seem to be extremely limited. For a comparison, take a look at my robust Procbook structured document application, which you can download for free from Shlomo Perets's www.microtype.com website (you'll find it under Dan Emory's articles). For the reasons cited above, I'm also puzzled by Scriptorium's DocFrame licensing approach. Clearly, any company which intended to use DocFrame for producing its technical documentation would have to make major changes to the delivered license package to make the product fit real-world requirements. These changes would impact the EDD, the DTD, the formatting template, the XML import/export application, the XSL transformations, and the DocFrame Author's and Developer's Guides. Consequently, there would never ba a need to purchase DocFrame author's licenses. Instead, such a company would purchase (at the exorbitant price of $1495) a single copy of the DocFrame Developer's License, make the necessary improvements and changes that fit its needs, and deliver the resulting modified versions of the structured template and the application files to all of its authors. ==================== | Nullius in Verba | ==================== Dan Emory, Dan Emory & Associates FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory@globalcrossing.net 177 Riverside Ave., STE F, #1151, Newport Beach, CA 92663 ---Subscribe to the "Free Framers" list by sending a message to majordomo@omsys.com with "subscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **