Re: FM / MacOS X: when? or switch to MS Office ?

[Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>]

Daniel,

Whoever your "commercial representative (in France)" happens to be,
he or she is very much talking out of turn and without the authority
of Adobe Systems. In other words, they are speculating and may be
very, very wrong!

        - Dov


At 2/3/2003 04:12 PM, daniel Azuelos wrote:
>John Root écrivait (wrote) :
>
>[...]
>| Despite the abundance of software for Windows operating systems, Macintosh
>| clearly remains (IMO) the most stable and productive platform.
>
>
>I can't agree more with you. When I said that MacOS, as an OS, hasn't 
>a real future (and not a really as I mistyped it), I was speaking of
>MacOS 9.2.2, not of MacOS X 10.2.3. I worked with nearly 20 different
>operating systems (among them a lot of Unix: SunOS, COS, AIX,
>Ultrix, Solaris, Linux, NetBSD, Tru64 Unix, HPUX..., and within the
>internals of some of them) and undoubtedly
>MacOS X is a great OS. MacOS X has a real future. MacOS not!
>I don't use MacOS anymore and Classic either. And I don't want to.
>I'd like to completely get rid of Classic on any Mac. (As I'd like
>to get rid of Windows on any PC :>).
>
>I'd really enjoy a Frame running on MacOS X.
> From what was answered by my commercial representative (in France),
>there won't be any Frame for MacOS X.
>
>Hence my quest for a Frame like environment on top of MacOS X.
>I'd like to hear a reply from Adobe.
>"What's the future of Frame on MacOS X?" (Please note the X, which
>stands for a quite different operating system).
>
>Will they advise me to switch to MS Office, or will they advise me to
>switch to Windows and to try to stay with Frame?
> From my point of vue, both will be good ways to sell me Microsoft
>software.
>
>Best regards.
>-- 
>daniel Azuelos            Pôle informatique         - Institut Pasteur



** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **