[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "'Art Campbell'" <campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Distiller Trivia (WAS RE: Frame 6 files only distilling in Black and White - help!)
From: Adam Korman <Adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:24:47 -0800
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
: My point was that the PostScript needs to be the same for us to : ensure that what we .pdf matches what we print. I'm talking about : pre-distillation; PostScript. That's the major flaw in your thinking. There's no good reason that the Postscript needs to match. It would make sense if you were trying to achieve exact replicability in a controlled environment, but that's not why anyone creates PDFs. What you're insisting is that your PDFs should be no better than the printers you use at the time you publish. In fact, the PDFs should include the quirks (as minor as they may be) of your printer's driver. Why would you want to include information that's only relevant to your printer in a PDF? : It's called a _portable_ format because it can travel. Yes, but it doesn't always travel well. How well it travels depends on what you do when you create the PDF. If you use device-dependent input (Postscript made with your printer driver), you will get device-dependent output. The instructions from Adobe are clear and unequivocal: to create device-independent PDFs, use the Distiller driver. There is nothing to be gained by using your printer driver. Of course, that begs the question -- if this is the case, why allow it at all? I'm guessing that it's just an implementation hack rather than of any real benefit to users. Cheers, Adam ========== Adam Korman Senior Designer Cooper Interaction Design adam@cooper.com 650.213.5104 ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **