[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "FrameUsers. com FrameMaker Discussion List" <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Free Framers" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: History lesson (VERY LONG)
From: "James Wynn" <ottofaij@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:09:25 -0600
References: <NDBBKGGOHBHIJJOJNBLMIEFLDFAA.stuartb@tpg.com.au>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
I wish Brad would excise all the text of the messages from these folks whining about a little advertising -- cluttering up my mailbox with blather -- and replace the text with ads. The child-like logic of people who do NOTHING substantial to keep this list in running order, and yet make ludicrous assertions that they have a right to determine how the list is maintained (financially or otherwise) is not at all endearing. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stuart Burnfield" <stuartb@tpg.com.au> To: "FrameUsers. com FrameMaker Discussion List" <framers@lists.raycomm.com>; "Free Framers" <framers@omsys.com> Cc: "Brad Anderson" <brad@FrameUsers.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:16 AM Subject: Re: History lesson (VERY LONG) > If you think the framers list is useful and worthwhile, don't you > think it's worth working to keep it that way? > > If a company (*) did own the list it would be a bad thing for the > list and for us members. It would stop being the good thing we all > enjoy and benefit from. > > Of course Brad *doesn't* own the list, and I suspect even he doesn't > really believe he does. But if we let him continue to act as though > framers is a commercial asset of his company, it will be just as > bad for the list and for us as if he did own it. > > That's why many of us get uneasy each time Brad asserts ownership > of the list (once subtly; now at last openly) or adds restrictions. > That's why I think it's important that each time someone calls him > on it, though I know many people find it mystifying and tedious > (and not all of them are newcomers). > > > So to settle this once and for all: (**) > > B R A D D O E S N' T O W N F R A M E R S > > ... therefore it would be a simple courtesy for him to clear any > money-making ideas (***) with us rather than just dictating them. > > Ads are a side issue. If it's a question of , then fine, > let's discuss it. > > I should say once again that I think Brad has done a good job over > the years and deserves our consideration and support for any ideas > to do with making the list work efficiently or helping to cover > running costs. > > If you made it this far, thanks for your time. > > Regards > --- > Stuart Burnfield > Gentoo Communications > mailto:stuartb@tpg.com.au > > > (*) Any company really; this isn't about Brad personally or his > company in particular. > > (**) Ho ho > > (***) Such as requiring us to register, then selling the details > (to pick one obviously outlandish idea) > > ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** > ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** > ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **