[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Gregory Henderson <gregoryd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: EDD question concerning lists
From: edunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:11:49 -0400
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
First I'd get rid of the ItemFirst element. Instead, use the {first} context rules to set the numbering of the first item to 1. More elegant, and you can reorder your lists without having to retag. To limit the number of nests I have only been able to think of two solutions: 1 - Ugly from a structure point of view is having distinct tags for each level. This is nasty because you lose the advantages of nesting and moving a nested structure will often require retagging. 2 - Define the numbering for the first two levels and then define the formatting as something large, bold, coloured, and strike-through for all further nesting. While it doesn't stop the authors from trying, it certainly tells them it's not wanted. Eric L. Dunn ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **