[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: <thomas.michanek@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: PDF graphics bewilderment
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 09:39:51 -0700
Cc: "'Jim Stauffer'" <jstauffer@xxxxxxx>, <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <001f01c115ab$49b93530$7cc909c0@tomasmw2k>
References: <8104DBB8386FD411B8A600D0B76FEAFE70E7F6@himalaya.pacband.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Acrobat 4.0x has a known problem in that indexed color (i.e. GIF and grayscale TIFF under Windows) images don't downsample or compress. This is fixed in Distiller 5. - Dov At 7/26/2001 01:16 AM, Thomas Michanek wrote: >> It's the downsampling that's killing your screenshots. Bitmap formats just >> don't survive that sampling. Stick with 8-bit Zip compression. > >I assume you know the difference between downsampling and compression. >I failed to mention that I have also tried 8-bit ZIP compression, >and the results are exactly the same, i.e. the problems with my >images are not the effect of any lossy compression (like JPEG). > >We prefer to downsample to keep the PDF file size smaller. It's >not a general problem with downsampling, as it only affects some >of the images (see my original message). We can of course settle >with no downsampling if there's no other way, but I'd like to know >why apparently some images are downsampled and others are not. > >I've been told there are bugs in Acrobat 4 with downsampling >and/or compression. Can anyone elaborate? > > >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >Thomas Michanek, Technical Writer >IAR Systems AB, Sweden: http://www.iar.com >mailto:Thomas.Michanek@iar.se >Tel: +46 18 167800, Fax: +46 18 167838 >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > >** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** >** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **