[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: KMcLauchlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Book Wide Variables (Was:RE: Re(2): Frame Wish List)
From: edunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:43:57 -0500
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
To me the question posed by Kevin and the subsequent answers are all off the mark. While the suggestions may be valid uses of book wide variables, there should be no need to define book wide variables at all. Just implement the feature and let each user define as many or as few variables as desired. The implementation should be something along the lines of a variable dialog accessible from the book window that would store variable names and values. In the document, there would be a local variable list and a book variable list. When the book is generated, the book variables in each document would then be updated to be the same. To ensure that this is done before printing, FM should warn about inconsistencies in book variables much like the color definitions or conditional text settings (But the messages should be clearer than the current uninformative inconsistency message). Eric L. Dunn PS: Highest on my wish list would be to make all building blocks valid in all instances and to get rid of the distinction (limits) of user vs. system variables (including the limit of 4 running headers and footers). Then get rid of all instances of the <$ > syntax requiring hand entry. >>What are some examples of other items >>that would make good bookwide variables? >>Title? Volume number (if you use that)... >>what else would be handy on a bookwide basis, >>or even just across a few chapters? >> >>Everybody feel free to jump in with suggestions. >> >>:-) >> >>/kevin ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **