[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Lee Richardson" <lhr@xxxxxxxxx>, <reuben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Adobe Professional Publishing Seminar!
From: "Thomas Michanek" <thomas.michanek@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:20:11 +0200
Cc: "Free Framers \(E-mail\)" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <LYRIS-42669-7536-2000.10.17-11.15.07--lhr#adobe.com@lists.frameusers.com> <p0432040fb612518aa8f0@[216.15.97.176]>
Reply-To: "Thomas Michanek" <thomas.michanek@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
A few days ago, Adobe invited people to a free "TOTAL PUBLISHING SEMINAR" dealing with InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop and PDF, but not FrameMaker. Lee Richardson responded to the criticism: > At 12:18 PM -0700 10/17/00, Reuben Patterson wrote: > > >The reason behind the title of the series, I can't say. > > Adobe defines 'Professional Publishing' as primarily magazines and > other high-design commercial publications. FrameMaker falls into > the 'Technical Publishing' area. Isn't this yet another reason why a *TOTAL* publishing seminar should include both 'professional' and 'technical' publishing??? (I still don't understand why 'professional' equals non-technical and 'technical' equals non-professional. That's exactly the message this labelling gives the customers.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Thomas Michanek, FrameMaker/UNIX/MIF expert mailto:Thomas.Michanek@telia.com (Sweden) http://w1.133.telia.com/~u13304072/framers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **