[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [New search]

RE: .fm vs .e## vs .xml

Robo for FrameMaker works with FM files, and Robo Office 5 works with MIF files.
The reason I mention Flare is that the future of Robo is the subject of some discussion ~ but it seems the guys who did robo-for-frame are now working on Flare ~ so when it comes out (and I am forced to change from my existing tools) it may be an option.

Regards,

Luke Hoban



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bill Swallow [mailto:techcommdood@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent:	Friday, 1 April 2005 2:45 PM
To:	Luke Hoban
Cc:	T.W. Smith; framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: .fm vs .e## vs .xml

A bit confusing. WWP will do it all. RH does not work with FM. Flare
is not out yet.

On Mar 31, 2005 11:00 PM, Luke Hoban <Luke.Hoban@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Good point ~ If you just want to port the content to flat HTML then WebWorks, Robo office 5 (and with any luck Flare from madcapsoftware) will allows you to port direct without having to finish round tripping to XML.
> But if you want to load the XML into a database and use it for other applications then you need to be able to port to XML first.




** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **