RE: Comparison of WebWorks and MIF2GO

[DW Emory <danemory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The following information is missing from the FAQ on your website:
1. You state that you support MIF import. Does that include structured docs 
and the application of EDD format rules to those docs?

2. Does the product support attributes?

3. Does the product include a full-feature implementation of XPath to 
assemble customized versions of a doc from the full content?

4. Does the product fully support XSL/SLT, XSL-FO, and exactly how is that 
support implemented?
At 10:09 AM 8/10/04 -0700, Rob Frankland wrote:
> There is another alternative - Veredus from Rascal Software. I am with the
> company for full disclosure. You can import MIF files into Veredus.
>
> Please go to www.rascalsoftware.com to get information about our company and
> Veredus, our XML-based single source authoring tool. If you go to
> www.rascalsoftware.com/veredus/free_trial.html you can download the trial.
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Rob
>
>
> Rob Frankland
> Rascal Software
> 1511 3rd Ave, #523
> Seattle, WA 98101
> 206-624-7300
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Thomas Michanek
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:11 AM
> To: Paul Turner; Free Framers
> Subject: Re: Comparison of WebWorks and MIF2GO
>
> [ The original message appeared on the FrameUsers mailing list.
>   This reply is sent only to the "Free Framers" mailing list. ]
>
> From: "Paul Turner" <paulturner1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Many of us across the planet are looking for a comparison and
> > critiques of WebWorks and MIF2GO, now that Macromedia has decided not
> > to continue development on RoboHelp for FrameMaker.
>
> I made a similar request a couple of years ago. I could probably look up all
> the messages and forward them to you, but essentially I learned the
> following:
>
> * Very few people have tried both products in real projects.
>   Playing with a demo or similar a short time won't give you
>   a real feel for the product's strengths and weaknesses.
>
> * Simple feature-by-feature comparisons won't say much.
>   It's more a matter of *how* things are accomplished.
>   Is there a GUI, do you need to learn a "language", etc.
>
> * Most people were very satisfied with the product they chose
>   to use, and didn't find a reason to try the other product.
>
> * The people using MIF2GO were generally more enthustiastic
>   about the product than the people using WWP, especially
>   considering the cost.
>
> Just have this in mind as the replies keep coming.
>
>
> _____________________________________________
> Thomas Michanek, FrameMaker/UNIX/MIF expert Technical Communicator, Uppsala,
> Sweden mailto:Thomas.Michanek@xxxxxxxxx http://go.to/framers/
> _____________________________________________
>
> Join the "Free Framers" mailing list: send an email to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx
> with "subscribe framers" in the body
>
>
>
> ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx **
> ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **
>
>
> ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx **
> ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **

FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing
DW Emory <danemory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **