[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Ridder, Fred" <fred.ridder@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Acrobat 6.0 web compatibility issue
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 09:52:51 -0800
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
You didn't explicitly say what your joboptions in for Distiller 6 were, but if your clients are using readers as far back as version 4, you MUST set the joboptions for PDF 1.3. - Dov At 2/6/2004 09:46 AM, Ridder, Fred wrote: >Has anyone else run into compatibility issues when providing >PDFs produced with Acrobat 6.0 on a website? Our group only >"upgraded" to Acrobat 6.0 recently, and one of the first >documents we put on our support website has produced >complaints from users attempting to access the document >from Internet Explorer with non-6.0 versions of Acrobat Reader >as the helper app. With Reader 5.0, some of the bookmarks jump >to incorrect locations. With Reader 4.0, certain bookmarks and >certain pages produce an error message saying "There was a >problem reading this document (14)." in the middle of an empty >document window. With Reader 6.0, though, everything works >fine. > >We tried a different copy of the same file which is accessible on >an intranet site on a totally different server from the first site, >and got exactly the same results. But if we access the file directly >(either the original file from a file server, or a copy of the file >downloaded from either website), it works just fine with any >version of Reader and Acrobat. > >At that point, we tried regenerating the PDF from the FM6.0 >source book with different variations of Distiller settings, and >fairly quickly determined that the problem is the "Optimize for >fast web view" option in Distiller 6.0. Regardless of other >settings, any file we distilled with that option selected couldn't >be viewed properly from a website using Reader 4.0 or 5.0. >I spent some time on the Adobe website looking for any mention >in the Knowledge Base about a known incompatibility, but as >usual lost patience before I got any meaningful returns. Has >anyone here seen the behavior I've described? > >After tracking down the problematic option setting, we did a >few further experiments and found that the File>Reduce File >Size command in Acrobat 6.0 Standard also produces the same >kind of web incompatibility when it is used on good PDFs (ones >distilled with the web optimize option turned off). This seemed >to be the case regardless of which compatibility level we chose >in the Reduce File Size dialog. > >My opinions only; I don't speak for Intel. >Fred Ridder ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **