[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [New search]

Re: Request for info re PostScript flows in FM



Do NOT remove the functionality!!!!!!!

Reason: we operate in an environment where each Frame book is stored in a
repository. If I wish to put links from one Frame document into another in
another book, I would have to check out both books and make sure that this is
always done in subsequent editing sessions carried out by other hands -- not
possible! And, added to that the fact that many of our books have links to
considerably more than one book -- some to as much as sixty others!!!! This is
very easy to maintain when the pdf links are passive through embedded ps. It
would be a nightmare if we used x-refs!

AND if that weren't enough: we also have a number of projects. The relationship
between the various directories on our various webservers is complex. The
relationships can be easily handled passively through embedded ps. It would not
be possible through setting up x-links!!!!!

If Adobe in a moment of __EXTREME_FOOLISHNESS__ were to take away this VALUABLE
facility (one that is a killer wrt MS Word!!!!!) it would have to (barest
minimum):

1. allow setting up a named destination in a dialogue (to replace the DEST
pdfmark)

2. being able to specify passively a link to a named pdf file and a dest within
it, as we can now do with GoToR.

Plus there's lots more. Like everything that you can now do with Schlomo's
Acrobat timesavers, for starters.

In short, taking away this IMPORTANT ps facility from Framemaker would be sheer
vandalism and would be quite unnecessary!!!!!!

Who are these idiots? Why are they intent on ruining a great product like the
Frame-acrobat duo???? What drugs are they taking??????? Give us their names and
we will have them killed!!!!

Could I express my anger any stronger??????


Yours in the belief that sanity will prevail,

Michael Richards.

Lee Richardson wrote:
> 
> FrameMaker has long included the ability to embed PostScript code directly into a FrameMaker document. We tried dropping support for embedded ps back in FM4, but received much feedback that it was important and useful.
> 
> Acrobat has included support for embedded ps in products through Acrobat 4.0 (PDF version 1.3). They're proposing removing this functionality in PDF 1.4, for a variety of reasons.
> 
> If this occurs, and there are no obvious workarounds, what functionality would need to be added to FrameMaker to make up for embedded ps? IE, if your documents contain ps flows, what do you use it for?
> 
> As examples, embedded ps was formerly used for PDF Doc Info; now unneeded with the addition of the PDF Doc Info dialog in FM6. There are additional reports of using embedded ps for printer tray control linked to particular master pages. What else?
> 
> You can reply directly to me. Thanks.
> 
> ...Lee
> 
> : Lee Richardson      : mailto:lhr@adobe.com : +1 408.536.6412     :
> : Dev Mgr, FrameMaker : Adobe Systems, Inc   : +1 408.537.5113 fax :
> 
> ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
> ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **

-- 
        Michael Richards
        Email:  michaelr@ind.tansu.com.au
        Tel: +61 2 9206 3524
        Locked Bag 6581 Sydney 1100
        Fax: +61 2 9281 1301
        New Wave-D,
        Telstra Corporation, Australia

** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **