[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "'framers@xxxxxxxxx'" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FrameMaker Jr (was: converting Word documents...)
From: "Snavely, Deborah" <dsnavely@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 12:51:23 -0700
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Kevin said, in part <snip> Adobe could play close to the vest by adding the capability to FM, to compile/generate "FrameMaker Junior" with the current document embedded (a Save as... option). The result would be a runtime doc-and-editor executable, complete. If it couldn't even import/open other docs, but could only save the current doc with changes (change bars?) in perfect FM format, ready for taking back into MY copy of FM, that would be sufficient for me. Then we wouldn't even need to justify extra "seats" for a standalone app. Hmm. Not sure how imported graphics would work, but the rest *sounds* straightforward. .... he said.... <end snip> A big obstacle to the acceptance of FrameViewer was the font problem; even when people could open your document, they got error messages about missing fonts. Because many technical reviewers appoint themselves graphic designers or copy-editors when they should be concentrating on reviewing the information and its technical accuracy, such "fonts missing" messages got in the way of acceptance of electronic editing processes. When one saves a file as a FrameMaker Junior document, Frame should: * automatically create FrameImages of medium quality (say 144 dpi) for every graphic image in the file or book (FrameImage technology's already in the product, just improve the low-res quality) * automatically embed all the fonts displayed in the document so that reviewers see an accurate representation of the document's layout and appearance (Adobe owns this technology in PDF, just borrow) * enable automatic whole-book assembly and deconstruction (that's tougher but should be simple from FM+SGML; perhaps a spot of PDF technology) If it did these two things and imported as seamlessly back to FrameMaker Sr as MIF does, Adobe might be able to fight back more successfully. IMHO, the corporate word-processing market needs something to kick the Word monolith in the teeth. But that's just my perception. Deborah Snavely Senior Documentation Specialist consulting at Visa standard disclaimers apply ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **