[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Michael Richards <michaelr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Competing with Word
From: Bill Briggs <web@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 10:49:37 -0400
Cc: FrameUsers List <Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Frame List <Framers@xxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <36EDCC29.EA929175@ind.tansu.com.au>
References: <4A256735.007F2BB1.00@mailgate.allegiance.com.au><36EDB65F.1A3B4B82@jaysmith.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
At 2:12 PM +1100 16/03/99, Michael Richards wrote: >1) bundling the product with as many scanner manufacturers as they could >get on >board. (I wonder what blandishments Adobe used? Any resemblance to the >>Olympics ........) One wonders, what would they bundle Frame with? >2) Deliberately not documenting the interesting bits of the user interface >so the the Graphics Arts Community (always at the time referred to in >hushed capitals) could discover these and pass them around as esoteric >guru-disciple fodder. > > ... Snip ... > >COULD A SIMILAR >STRATEGY BE THE REASON WHY THEY TOOK SO MUCH OUT OF THE FRAME MANUALS AT >5.5.x? Software manuals are shrinking all over the place. Look at what happened to the manuals for Windows and the Mac OS. They've all but disappeared into a flimsy help system. New users, if they like to learn by reading, are forced to buy some hefty third party publication of 1000+ pages. Some of them are excellent, but they put the expense of a manual directly on the user. And the price of the OS upgrade has not come down. It's US $30 to $50 out of your pocket (and the exchange challenged like me pay more). On-line help is fine for some purposes, but I'll take a printed manual any day. >And now, the good news (this is where Frame comes in, folks!): > >We old Photoshop hands remember the terrible time when Photoshop migrated to >version 2.5. This, although numbered as if a minor upgrade, was actually a >complete rewrite in C++ (or whatever) to allow for cross-platform >compatibility. >It was a bug-ridden disaster of the first magnitude. The fixes came thick and >fast and good old Photoshop is now pretty stable -- especially in >comparison to >one of the older versions. If I'm not mistaken, they have already moved Frame to a common code base, which almost surely caused problems. To this jaded soldier, thick and fast wouldn't really describe the recent history of fixes. - web ... who likes to read well written software manuals - really! ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **