[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Hedley Finger, Hand Holding Projects" <hfinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, FrameUsers List <Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Frame List <Framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Competing with Word
From: Jay Smith <jay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:39:43 -0500
Organization: Jay Smith & Associates
References: <4A256735.007F2BB1.00@mailgate.allegiance.com.au>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Hedley, I like your concept, most particularly, the ability to "lock" the tags -- I would myself readily buy several copies of such a program and give it to my technical authors. The only suggestion that I would add is that there should be an easy and clearly screen-visible way to see where the FrameWriter users did overrides. Reason: they might be using overrides because of a lack in the template's tags -- the "template owner" would want to see where overrides were used so that they could be implemented back in the template's tags if appropriate. -- Jay Smith e-mail: jay@jaysmith.com The Press for History(tm), The Press for Education(tm), The Press for [Your Industry](tm), The Press for....(tm) On-demand printing and binding of hardbound books. Minimum run one copy. P.O. Box 650 Snow Camp, NC 27349 USA Phone: Int+US+336-376-9991 Toll-Free Phone in US & Canada: 1-800-447-8267 Fax: Int+US+336-376-6750 Hedley_S_Finger@allegiance.com.au wrote: > > Dal and all: > > > > >Lately there has been a thread concerning InDesign and Frame and the lack > of > >marketing Frame has because of the smaller market which in turn could > affect > >the future of FrameMaker. I think everybody knows the two main reasons why > >more people aren't using Frame, 1. $$$$ 2. perceived steep learning curve > by > >non-users. We as a Frame community obviously can't control the first > reason, > >but we can influence the second. > > > > In my efforts to promote FrameMaker I generally tell prospects that the > development of FM documents proceeds in two phases: > > 1 Difficult phase: developing a template with tags, layout, etc. for a > particular application, for example, a cookbook, requiring a good deal of > typographic expertise and familiarity with the FrameMaker way. > > 2 Easy phase: developing the content for the publication using the > template, requiring only basic word processing skills (plus indexing, etc. > skills) and familiarity with word processing applications in general. > > I use the notion of designing a customised word-processor for writing > particular kinds of books. Given a template, it is actually quite easy to > teach someone to use FM provided that the para tags, table formats, etc. > are rich enough to meet the writer's needs. > > Perhaps Adobe marketing could address the problems of '1. $$$$ 2. perceived > steep learning curve' by releasing FrameWriter, a cheap product at $50 a > seat which can use templates but not create them, that is, you could > override a para tag by adding a tab but you could not create a para tag, > table format, page layout, etc. > > This would appeal to the bean counters who can only see that MS Office > costs less, fit my model of the design and writing phases, and overcome the > problem of the cowboys in a writing team that create their own tags and > formats. > > The book publishing industry, at least in Australia, relies to a large > extent on short-term freelancers (read 'contractors'). FrameWriter would be > cheap enough for authors, and freelance copy-editors, indexers, and > proofreaders to purchase. It would maintain the integrity of a designer's > template. > > In the book industry at the moment, authors generally submit their > manuscript in Word, the freelance editor edits it in Word, the freelance > designers convert the Word files to Quark Xpress and lay out the pages, and > meanwhile the freelance indexer uses a third-party tool such as MacRex to > compile the index which is pasted in as a separate file NOT linked to the > text (I am not making this up). > > The marketing model I propose would make it easier to implement FM into > this workflow, especially if FrameWriter mimicked Word commands. > FrameWriter would replace Word and FrameMaker would replace Xpress for > those books that were not design intensive (after fixing up footnotes and > citations, of course). FM's superior ability to work with multiple files > constituting a book would also allow the various parties to work on > different parts of a book at the same time. > > How about it, John and Chuck? > > Regards, > Hedley > > ==================================================================== > > Hedley Finger > User documentation and publishing consultant > Adobe(R) Certified Expert, FrameMaker 5.5 > > Hand Holding Projects Pty Ltd ACN 007 418 153 > 28 Regent Street Burwood VIC 3125 Australia > Tel +61 3 9809 1229 Fax +61 3 9809 1326 Mobile +61 412 461 558 > E-mail <mailto:hfinger@handholding.com.au> ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **