[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "'framers@xxxxxxxxx'" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: sort bug in Frame 5.5.x, including 5.5.6; cross-platform
From: "Snavely, Deborah" <dsnavely@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 14:55:11 -0800
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Framers, For those of you who tend to lean into a program, here's a bug I just discovered in Frame 5.5.3 that Adobe tells me is not resolved in Frame 5.5.6. If you have cross-reference markers in a table and sort the table, all the cross-reference markers are lost. This bug operates in 5.5.x on Mac and (at least) Windows 95 by my recent experience. Adobe's developer-support explanation for the problem is that the sort function in FrameMaker is an API, and the API relies on text when it sorts, ignoring the markers and consequently deleting them (at least it left the cross-refs alone or my document would be half missing). I haven't tested it, but Adobe support indicated that the same effect would likely occur if you had other markers in the table (index or ?). Perhaps it's old news to many of you, but I suspect I'll be looking into those Caxton utilities again. My last firm had just purchased them before I left. My document is a "super-glossary" that rolled several glossaries into one and used conditions to be able to segregate them into individual ones or combination ones when required. I was putting in cross-references ready to generate hyperlinks in the PDF document that'll be used for review (and eventually on an internal web site). I'm now re-designing my doc strategy for the doc, and also placed an RFE with Adobe that Frame retain conditions when you convert table cells to paragraphs! Deborah Snavely Senior Technical Writer consulting at Visa standard disclaimers apply ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **