[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Thomas Michanek <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Censorship alive and well on frameusers
From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:08:11 -0500
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ghea0NJcS9a8oOt90q1bh88ee/KLBBz3OxjsB37lTyqSysuLrDc3y7pxaUPYloUOIkLX+1bmoFyBG9Jn0TbIVHTmI+bab5WbHbHFBTftCIsFR1QAZFpIPnL9beWupmKaURa7JqL8FYHAfEBji9xmwNuBCmsZv9YzFLLbpEOgqss=
In-reply-to: <02e301c5ef93$c330e680$371dfa53@comhem.se>
References: <OF19D8B373.76FE8DEF-ONCA2570C1.0007E2BF-CA2570C1.000A4E45@myob.com.au> <375e3cb30511220741t3f0cc84fmdcee8cd84e86f711@mail.gmail.com> <02e301c5ef93$c330e680$371dfa53@comhem.se>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
> And Bill, don't you think it's odd that the *only* message in > this thread that apparently made it through to the FrameUsers > list (according to the new archive) is your own, which just > happens to be the message with no criticism? Or could you > confirm that the other five messages were actually posted > to FrameUsers? To be honest, I hadn't noticed. I filter Framers and FreeFramers using the same label, so they all just come in as "FrameMaker". I tend to ignore the divide, -- Bill Swallow HATT List Owner WWP-Users List Owner 42.8162,-73.7736 http://techcommdood.blogspot.com ============================ I support Char James-Tanny for STC Secretary. ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **