[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Bill Swallow" <techcommdood@xxxxxxxxx>, <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Censorship alive and well on frameusers
From: "Thomas Michanek" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:37:10 +0100
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
Organization: FrameMaker Expert
References: <OF19D8B373.76FE8DEF-ONCA2570C1.0007E2BF-CA2570C1.000A4E45@myob.com.au> <375e3cb30511220741t3f0cc84fmdcee8cd84e86f711@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
To a certain degree, I can agree with Bill that maybe the messages in this topic are a bit premature. Maybe things simply haven't settled down yet, and things will improve. On the other hand, the concerns raised are very much valid. Needless to say, I won't consider re-subscribing to FrameUsers until Lisa adress them somehow. And Bill, don't you think it's odd that the *only* message in this thread that apparently made it through to the FrameUsers list (according to the new archive) is your own, which just happens to be the message with no criticism? Or could you confirm that the other five messages were actually posted to FrameUsers? /Thomas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Swallow" <techcommdood@xxxxxxxxx> To: <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <framers@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 4:41 PM Subject: Re: Censorship alive and well on frameusers > Wow. > > I saw the list transition as transparent, save for a "moderated" > message once and only once. I asked Lisa about it privately and she > told me it was a one-time deal due to moving over to the new list > platform. > > Sounded fair to me. > > It seems the noise being generated around this topic is more > politically focused than anything else... > > Can we move on now? ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **