[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
Subject: RE: Workflow
From: David Crowe <David.Crowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:43:02 -0600
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
In-reply-to: <A3A0500297E6654FB3CAC9D7901E4695016E26B6@mail01.IMPRIVATA.COM>
References: <A3A0500297E6654FB3CAC9D7901E4695016E26B6@mail01.IMPRIVATA.COM>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
I use paper copies as well. I gave my reviewers the choice, and most of them wanted paper. They sometimes include diagrams or other sketches to help make a point. Many of them appreciate the chance to take a hardcopy offsite and our boss declares a doc-day: they can be anywhere they like as long as they do a quality review. Sometimes a quick reviewer can pass a review copy to another reviewer so we get the benefit of a sequential review if the last guy in the link is not a slowpoke. I provide red pens, highlighters, and any other tools they need,and plenty of positive feedback. Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer paper anyway. Of course, the original poster had to deal with some remote reviewers, and for them circulating hard-copy is not an option. I do get some reviews from the support guys out in the field - they read the PDF and then send emails with page-specific comments, but I think adding the email step is a deterrent to mentioning little glitches. ...and what works for me in a 40-person company won't work for bigger departments. But for what it's worth, that's my feedback.
Behalf-----Original Message----- From: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx] OnformsOf Clare Stewart Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:59 AM To: waynefb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: FramersLIst Subject: Re: Workflow
I work in the area of Clinical Trials, where everything must be done according to regulations. We don't let anyone touch our FrameMaker- not even team members. We actually circulate paper copies!their
Clare
waynefb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > We're having a workflow brainstorming session at work and from it we came away with limited solutions. I'm curious if anybody else hasreviewers directly edit frame documents, or how people are doingreviews.We have several people which need to review documents and they arelocatedin several locations across the globe. The current idea is to use CVSandhave them checkout the Frame document, mark it up and check it back in(wewould control the commit process). But, I'm not sure how well thiswillwork with multiple reviewers looking at the same document at the sametime.While PDF might still be an option, nobody is thrilled with thatoptionsystemsince it is a very tedious process for everybody involved. > > If people have ideas, please feel free to contact me off list if you don't think this list is the right place for this discussion. > > Regards, > Wayne > > ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** > ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** >
-- Secrecy, being an instrument of conspiracy, ought never to be the> Clinical Trials Methodology Groupof a regular government. -Jeremy Bentham, jurist and philosopher (1748-1832)
Clare Stewart Research AssistantMcMaster University 905-527-2299 x 43791 stewartc@xxxxxxxxxxx
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **