[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: <waynefb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Workflow
From: "Szczesniak, Barbara" <bszczesniak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:39:26 -0400
Cc: "FramersLIst" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcVl8coTycmDEnU4QKucBM1ayyW6xwAA8CQw
Thread-topic: Workflow
Gee, I'd just love to have the developers actually review the book. Our current review process seems to be: release the document and have users send e-mails to support when something doesn't work as documented. With a 1000+ page developer's guide, it's a scary life I lead. It's comforting to know that there are still places where documents are reviewed. I have worked in such companies in the past. I liked the company where all reviewers had a full version of Acrobat, we passed one file around, and each reviewer could read the comments of others and put in their comments in a different color. That was before Acrobat 7, of course, which is the route I would choose now if I actually needed a review process. -- Barbara Szczesniak waynefb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > We're having a workflow brainstorming session at work and from it we came away with limited solutions. I'm curious if anybody else has their reviewers directly edit frame documents, or how people are doing reviews. We have several people which need to review documents and they are located in several locations across the globe. The current idea is to use CVS and have them checkout the Frame document, mark it up and check it back in (we would control the commit process). But, I'm not sure how well this will work with multiple reviewers looking at the same document at the same time. While PDF might still be an option, nobody is thrilled with that option since it is a very tedious process for everybody involved. > > If people have ideas, please feel free to contact me off list if you don't think this list is the right place for this discussion. > > Regards, > Wayne > > ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** > ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** > -- Secrecy, being an instrument of conspiracy, ought never to be the system of a regular government. -Jeremy Bentham, jurist and philosopher (1748-1832) Clare Stewart Research Assistant Clinical Trials Methodology Group McMaster University 905-527-2299 x 43791 stewartc@xxxxxxxxxxx ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **