[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Luke Hoban <Luke.Hoban@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: .fm vs .e## vs .xml
From: David Knopf <dklists@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:49:06 -0800
Cc: Bill Swallow <techcommdood@xxxxxxxxx>, "T.W. Smith" <techwordsmith@xxxxxxxxx>, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
In-reply-to: <5E06BFED29594F4C9C5EBE230DE320C60740F539@ewok.vsl.com.au>
References: <5E06BFED29594F4C9C5EBE230DE320C60740F539@ewok.vsl.com.au>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
Robo for FrameMaker works with FM files,
and Robo Office 5 works with MIF files.
The reason I mention Flare is that the future of Robo is the subject of some discussion ~ but it seems the guys who did robo-for-frame are now working on Flare ~ so when it comes out (and I am forced to change from my existing tools) it may be an option.
-- David Knopf ~ Knopf Online ~ www.knopf.com
---------------------------------------------------------- Please send follow-up questions to the list. Contact me directly with business inquiries or comments. ----------------------------------------------------------
Consulting & Training for Technical Communicators RoboHelp ~ FrameMaker ~ WebWorks ~ Structured Authoring ~ XML WebWorks Publisher Certified ~ Adobe Certified Expert: FrameMaker Moderator, HATT, wwp-users & Techshoret
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **