[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: framers@xxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: .fm vs .e## vs .xml
From: "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:52:22 -0800
Cc: Bill Swallow <techcommdood@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
In-reply-to: <LYRIS-25411-2014180-2005.03.31-17.58.17--jeremy#omsys.com@lists.FrameUsers.com>
Organization: Omni Systems, Inc.
References: <LYRIS-170613-2014173-2005.03.31-17.33.05--techcommdood#gmail.com@lists.FrameUsers.com> <LYRIS-25411-2014180-2005.03.31-17.58.17--jeremy#omsys.com@lists.FrameUsers.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:48:34 -0500, Bill Swallow <techcommdood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >FrameMaker comes with WebWorks Publisher Standard Edition free of >charge. She can pump out something webbish using that. If she wants, >she can pay Quadralay about $900 to upgrade to Professional and then >pump out tons of different formats and have control over styles used >in the conversion process. Or she can pay Omni Systems just $295 for Mif2Go and do the very same thing, after trying out the free demo and seeing how it works for her: http://www.omsys.com/dcl/download.htm It worked fine for us, generating a Web site from a Frame book... her original question. Our own Web site is done that way, menus and all. We've had more than a few WWP users switch to Mif2Go, which obviously was not because of the price, as they already had WWP. Wonder why? ;-) -- Jeremy H. Griffith, at Omni Systems Inc. <jeremy@xxxxxxxxx> http://www.omsys.com/ ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **