[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Allen Schaaf <soundbyte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Running FrameMaker on WINE or CrossOver Office on Linux
From: "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 22:43:18 +0400
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20030910220039.00a391c0@pop.sfo.com>
Organization: bitplant.de GmbH & Co. IT-Services KG
References: <5.0.0.25.2.20030910220039.00a391c0@pop.sfo.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Hello Allen, On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:00:54 -0700 Allen Schaaf <soundbyte@sound-by-design.com> wrote: > At 02:26 AM 8/14/03, Oleg A.Paraschenko wrote: > Hello Hedley, > > On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:30:08 +1000 > hedley_finger@myob.com.au wrote: > > > > > All: > > > > Has anybody tried running FrameMaker on WINE > > Some time ago I tried to use FrameMaker on WINE, but wuthout > success. Yes, I was able to type some text and generate > PostScripts, but I found that FM was very unstable. So I > switched to VMWARE (virtual computer emulator). > > Oleg, > > I'm thinking of moving totally to Linux, but Frame, Acrobat, > etc., have made me hesitate. > > If you don't mind, what is your real world experience with > running Frame on a Linux box with VMWare? Let's try. > What version of Frame are you running? 5.5, 6, 7. > Does it as smoothly (HA!) as it does on a W2K > machine? My office applications work under VMWare as smooth as under w2k. > What about the other applications? > > My other choice is to go to a Mac running OS 10, but I know that I have no experience with Mac. > > you have to run Frame in some weird way (at least to a PC user) > when you do this. > > What is your best judgement, move now or what a while longer? It is not a problem to try. VMWare has an evaluation license. Below are some notes. Performance hint: RAM of virtual machine should completely fit to free memory of real machine. On my 512 Mb machine, I add 1 Gb file swap (it is too big, but let it be so) and configure virtual machine to have 384 Mb of RAM. Another hint: run only 32-bit applications. No MS-DOS or console tools. So w2k much faster than windows 95. With this conditions, I see no difference between running FrameMaker under w2k or vmware/w2k. All is stable enough. The only crashes I have are when Windows perform power-save operations. There are problems with DirectX applications and system-hardcore tools -- they are just not working. One of the problems is (maybe was) Adobe Acrobat (including Reader). One of security plugins detects non-standard mode of system and closes Acrobat. The simplest way to solve the problem is to delete this plugin. I hope it is not a violation DMCA. Sometimes I need plain w2k without vmware. So I have dual-boot workstation and configured vmware to use already installed w2k. In w2k itself, I created two profiles: one profile to run under vmware and another profile to run under vmware. Profiles differ in hardware, ip and other settings. > > Thanks for your help. I hope my remarks make sense. > > Best to you and yours, > Allen Schaaf > Information Engineering > http://techwriter.doctordoc.info/ > > The world is my oyster. Now if I can only > figure out where they hid the pearl.... > > > ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** > ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** > -- -- Oleg Paraschenko olpa@ http://bitplant.de/ - IT Services company SGML/XML/Content management/WWW/Databases/Win32/Plug-ins/Scripts ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **