[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Peter Spicer <pspicer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ATM install question from f2a member
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:48:46 -0800
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx, Frame2Acrobat@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <OFFF4698DA.F4F80EBB-ON88256CD7.007EC62C-88256CD7.007F717B@us.ibm.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
There is no conflict between ATM Deluxe (or Lite) 4.1 and Windows 2000 or XP. Windows XP actually controls the "realization" of all fonts and also allows installation of Type 1, TrueType, and OpenType fonts, but not Multiple Master instances. ATM Lite 4.1 simply provides the ability to install and coerce the OS into providing realization of Multiple Master instances. ATM Deluxe 4.1 provides the Multiple Master services as well as the ability to install, delete, group into sets, activate, and deactivate fonts. In no case does ATM 4.1 under Windows 2000/XP actually realize the font data for display or printing like it once did under Windows'9x/Me/NT 4. - Dov At 2/24/2003 03:12 PM, Peter Spicer wrote: >Dov >Thank you for your response. I remembered FM versions of the past shipping >ATM with it - hence my "requirement" comment. > >If I want "font management" as you correctly describe it, can I use Adobe >Type Manager Deluxe 4.1 on XP Pro without interfering with anything XP Pro >is trying to do with fonts on its own. In other words is there a potential >clash or conflict of interest having ATM Deluxe running? I think this >question is closer to "what I heard about XP" - with ATM Deluxe installed, >who is controlling the font support - native XP behavior, or my installed >ATM? > >Peter ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **