re: super computer

[Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nope, unless you have graphics that are exceptionally complex
vector graphics in WMF or EMF format. Even the most pedestrian
(i.e., inexpensive) graphics cards should be perfectly fine
for FrameMaker. 

        - Dov

At 12/3/2002 11:22 AM, Gary.Fuchs@ambest.com wrote:
>Dov,
>
>For that many big graphics, don't you think the video card is pretty
>important to performance (before pdf, of course)?
>
>Regards,
>Gary Fuchs
>
>
>>>At 12/3/2002 09:10 AM, Greg Bathon wrote:
>>Hello all-
>>
>>As budget time approaches, any suggestions for the ideal "super computer"
>to work with graphics-heavy frame files?  We have clients that put their
>entire manuals into ONE Frame file, with 2-4 graphics on each page.  The
>graphics are anywhere from 1 to 15 MB, and it takes an average of 2 minutes
>per page to print to PDF and even then we have to print in batches of 5
>pages at a clip, otherwise we get a system crash.
>>
>>Right now, our stations are running:
>>Windows XP (with Service Pack 1)
>>Pentium III, 930 MHz
>>256MB RAM
>>
>>FrameMaker 6 with the XP update installed.


** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **