[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FM-to-Word & vice-versa (was Re: Another newbie question:
From: "Craig Ede" <craig.ede@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 15:33:09 -0500
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Does the same apply to XML<=>FrameMaker round-tripping? Craig >>> Dov Isaacs <isaacs@Adobe.COM> 08/08/02 03:04PM >>> I have been following this discussion all morning and want to confirm that in the general case there is no way that one can do round-tripping from Word to FrameMaker and back yielding a Word document that matches the original Word document exactly. Neither Word nor FrameMaker are supersets of the other. They have different feature sets that make different in-context assumptions about the content involved. Only with the simplest of text-based layouts can one come even close to a "round-trip" identity. And this isn't just a FrameMaker issue with Word or vice versa. Unless two document processing programs have identical feature sets, a common document format, an identical interpretation of those features and format, and a common layout engine, conversions of content between two such document "systems" will always at best be a series of guesses and compromises. And workflows that depend on round-tripping, except for simple, well-crafted situations, will always be highly problematic. This also extends to issues such as FrameMaker to PDF and then attempting to reconstruct a FrameMaker document from the PDF file. At best, the text and a large amount of the formatting can be resurrected. The original document, including styles, cannot be. - Dov At 8/8/2002 11:23 AM, Sean Brierley wrote: >Why would you expect roundtripping to work? > >My perception is that FrameMaker and Word do things in >very different ways for very different audiences. > >Each has its own strengths and weaknesses, but neither >one duplicates the other. They do not completely >overlap each other; Word and FrameMaker each do things >the other cannot. > >I think the idea of near-seamless roundtripping is not >reasonably possible. > >Cheers, > >Sean > > >--- Barbara White <bjw@sei.cmu.edu> wrote: >> eric.dunn@ca.transport.bombardier.com wrote: >> >> In an environment where you have Word people and FM >> people, it would be >> nice to have a way to go back/forth between Word and >> FM in collaborating >> on the same document. ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **