[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Lee, Ivan" <ilee@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The Facts (WAS: Distiller Trivia (WAS RE: Frame 6 files only-- distilling in Black and White - help!))
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:52:19 -0800
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <LISTMANAGER-25396-18039-2002.03.21-11.39.30--isaacs#adobe.com@lists.raycomm.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
In short, a qualified "yes!" - Dov At 3/21/2002 10:38 AM, Lee, Ivan wrote: >This has been a very enlightnening thread. One thing I'd like >clarified. A "yes" or "no" answer will suffice. In the past I had >onced asked why using "Save As" was wrong if the resulting PDF looked >fine and acted fine. (We don't Save As anymore, by the way). Most of >the standard reasons came up. But this is the first time I've heard >that when you print to a printer driver instance other than Distiller, >the PDF inherits the limitations of that printer (imageable areas, paper >size, color, etc.). > >So as I understand it now, when we used "Save As," it meant that >whatever driver instance it was printing to (which was most likely our >physical printer's driver instance), the PDF inherited our physical >printer's limitations? Is this correct - and is this what you mean when >a PDF is device dependent...that the PDF will print correctly when >hardcopy printed on our printer, but may not necessarily come out >correct if printed to a different physical printer? > >When FM 7 comes out with the new and improved "Save As" function, >this'll all be moot, but I'd like to know all the same. Much thanks for >all the info. > >Ivan Lee >Senior Technical Writer >Bank of Hawaii ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **