[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
Subject: RE: Distiller Trivia
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:49:24 -0800
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <OFEDE65928.4A069CC7-ONC1256B83.002D2DA4@snb.ch>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Matthias, Unfortunately, what you consider a "feature" others might consider a severe liability. The "device independent" PostScript you refer to is Level 1 PostScript, optimized for nothing and unable to take advantage of features of particular PostScript devices when the PostScript is destined for a real printing device as opposed to the Distiller. Virtually all UNIX applications have similarly poor support for output because there are no real system-level facilities for generation of output page description language from any internal graphics model. Adobe has not "forgotten" about UNIX. We develop software for whatever platforms can be justified by reasonable analysis of costs and returns on investment. There is a TREMENDOUS fixed overhead cost of developing, testing, marketing, and supporting any particular software package on any particular OS platform. That overhead is the same whether we have 10 customers or 100,000 customers for that application/platform combination. One of the biggest problems with "UNIX" is there is no single UNIX. This is a legacy of the famous AT&T versus BSD fights of the early 1980s coupled with each UNIX system vendor differentiating their systems into mutual incompatibility. (Years back, I managed engineering organizations that did UNIX OS work as well as applications and utilities on top of UNIX systems. It was "ifdef Hell"!) As such, each variant of UNIX must be considered as a totally separate platform for purposes of analyzing costs and return on investment. LINUX is another variant of UNIX, but with its own variants dependent upon the supplier and what GUI and optional features they bundle with their particular "distribution". - Dov At 3/21/2002 12:13 AM, Matthias.Dillier@snb.ch wrote: >Hi > >One more time this discussion but what about UNIX (or Linux)? >When you use FM on UNIX, there you will have simple, deviceindependent >PS-ouput which you can use to produce your PDF-files. No trouble with all >this different drivers.... >The main problem there is, that Adobe seems to have forgotten, that there >exist operating systems beside MS-Windows and Mac-OS. (FM started on >UNIX-plattforms, but this seems to be a long time ago.) > >Regards, >Matthias Dillier > ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **