[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: edunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FM+SGML: Conditions and attributes?
From: Dan Emory <danemory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:19:00 -0800
Cc: Mark Barratt <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <85256B0C.00715AC9.00@btg_hub01.bombardier.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
But the approach described by Eric Dunn below wouldn't work when only part of the text within a paragraph is conditionalized. And if the conditional text spans the contents of multiple elements, you'd have to set the condition attribute in each of those elements. Furthermore, almost any element containing text, graphics, tables, table components, cross-references, etc. may be a candidate for conditional text. Thus, it seems to me that a single pair of elements marking the beginning and end of a conditional text instance is much simpler, easier to implement, and probably more amenable to automation with a Framescript or an API. At 03:38 PM 11/22/01 -0500, edunn@transport.bombardier.com wrote: >How about taking a similar approach and identifying which elements may be >conditionalised and adding a condition attribute to those elements? >This would control which information/content could be conditional. Framescript >should still be able to apply/preserve the conditional tagging. > >Eric L. Dunn > ==================== | Nullius in Verba | ==================== Dan Emory, Dan Emory & Associates FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory@primenet.com 177 Riverside Ave., STE F, #1151, Newport Beach, CA 92663 ---Subscribe to the "Free Framers" list by sending a message to majordomo@omsys.com with "subscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **