[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: FrameUsers <Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Framers <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: thin spaces again
From: Thomas Neuburger <thomasn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 09:28:10 -0800
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Great discussion. For what it's worth, I've settled on en dashes without thin spaces for number ranges, and em dashes *with* thin spaces for long dashed in text. You would think that the two dash types wouldn't touch the before and aft characters, but they sometimes does. So I use thin spaces around em dashes. For me, that look is better than the alternative. Tom Neuburger The Masters Series FrameMaker 6 ISBN 1-930597-01-0 On sale at www.bn.com >Subject: Re: thin spaces again >From: Jan Henning <henning@r-l.de> >Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 09:59:29 +0100 >X-Message-Number: 3 > > >My recollection is that for ranges of numerals (e. g., 1999 - 2000), > >one should use an en-dash, with thin spaces on either side. > >For what it's worth: While the Chicago Manual of Style does not seem to >specifically say anything on the subject, they use en-dashes without any= > >kind of space (e.g. 1999-2000). > >(The standard in German typography is to use no space or a very narrow >space - a FrameMaker thin space would probably already be too wide.) > >Regards >Jan Henning ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **