[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: jeremy@xxxxxxxxx (Jeremy H. Griffith)
Subject: Re: Distinguishing Text Insets
From: "Lynne A. Price" <lprice@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 22:06:28 -0700
Cc: "Mitchell, Sue" <Sue.Mitchell@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Framers (framers@xxxxxxxxx)'" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <3c16e08c.588999696@smtp.omsys.com>
References: <3.0.1.32.20011022170030.0092d100@pop.business.earthlink.net><FB15E670DA55D51185350008C786514A011C368D@sottexch1.cognos.com><FB15E670DA55D51185350008C786514A011C368D@sottexch1.cognos.com><3.0.1.32.20011022170030.0092d100@pop.business.earthlink.net>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
At 03:25 AM 10/23/01 GMT, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote: >> Warning: if you update text insets, the condition tag is discarded so >>you need to reapply. > >Didn't know that. Thanks! Jeremy, You are quite welcome. I just encountered this situation fairly recently. It sort of makes sense--updating a text inset produces the same result as deleting and reinserting the text inset and, of course, that approach would not preserve the condition tag. --Lynne Lynne A. Price Text Structure Consulting, Inc. Specializing in FrameMaker+SGML consulting and training lprice@txstruct.com http://www.txstruct.com voice/fax: (510) 583-1505 ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **