[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: hedley_finger@xxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Framers List), framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Frame vs. word AGAIN
From: Bill Briggs <web@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:02:44 -0300
In-Reply-To: <LISTMANAGER-25651-10821-2001.10.16-17.41.18--web#nbnet.nb.ca@lists.raycomm.com>
References: <LISTMANAGER-25651-10821-2001.10.16-17.41.18--web#nbnet.nb.ca@lists.raycomm.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
At 9:27 AM +1000 17/10/01, hedley_finger@myob.com.au wrote: >We also use conditions >to handle spelling and idiom variations, for example, "color" in USA and >Canada versus "colour" in Australia and UK, Whoa Hedley! It's *colour* up here in the great white north. Most of us prefer the British spelling conventions. But as we are so close to the US market, there is some pandering to US (Webster) convention in the print media. We often have disputes about such things. :-) >or "one through four" in USA >versus "one to four" in Canada, UK, and Australia. In this case I can't make a determination without the rest of the context. I can see cases where one or the other would be used. - web ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **