[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "David Cramer" <dacramer@xxxxxxxx>, "Free Framers" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Mac Frame users: OSX
From: "Thomas Michanek" <thomas.michanek@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:48:52 +0200
Organization: At home
References: <LYRIS-71113-114166-2001.06.27-08.19.00--chattare#telia.com@lists.frameusers.com>
Reply-To: "Thomas Michanek" <thomas.michanek@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
*** The original message appeared on the FrameUsers mailing list. *** This reply is copied only to the framers@omsys.com mailing list. From: "David Cramer" <dacramer@home.com> > I will be holding off before upgrading to Mac OSX primarily because > of Adobe's apparent lack of interest in investing in OSX development. > I know that Adobe is heavily controlled by its marketing surveys. My > concerns over the last few years have been that their surveys seem to > have no awareness that the future will be different from the present. > I'd like to see some more enlightened forecasting rolled into the > surveys. It's the lack of forecasting that has cancelled FrameMaker > for Linux and is pooh-poohing Mac OSX development. I don't know much about Adobe's marketing surveys, but I share the same conclusion you make. Adobe has developed from a company largely based on visions of the future, to a company nearly completely controlled by short-sighted profit. To invest time, money and knowledge into areas that have a potential to be successful and profitable in a few years time is no longer the company's greatest strength. You cannot simply sit around and wait for new technologies, markets or operating systems to become profitable before you take action. As you say, Adobe seems to "get it" in a few areas such as electronic document formats, but unfortunately not in areas dealing with (non-Windows) operating systems. > Besides that, I don't think Adobe fully realizes how effective they > are as agents of change. This is the very essence of my own point of view. By actively promoting and giving positive signs of interest in a "market", Adobe can influence its future development and thereby help giving them return of investment. Taking the release cycle of FM into account, one has to be able to either correctly forecast what will be profitable a couple of years ahead, or sit down and look at emerging technologies, software, operating systems, etc. from more angles than current profitability and then invest into these areas. > I don't think John Warnock looked at the fact there were no laser > printers and no desktop publishing and said, "Nah, let's not waste > time developing PostScript. Who'd use it?" Exactly! This is what created Adobe in the first place. Has really the computer industry stalled in development of new technologies? Will Microsoft continue to dominate the OS market forever? Of course not. There is an expression applicable to most businesses: "don't put all your eggs into the same basket". I just wish Adobe could obey it. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Thomas Michanek, FrameMaker/UNIX/MIF expert Technical Writer, IAR Systems, Uppsala, Sweden mailto:Thomas.Michanek@telia.com http://w1.184.telia.com/~u18407300/ * * NEW WEB ADDRESS SINCE JUNE 1 * * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **