[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Framers' List" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: HTML Transit v. Webworks Publisher
From: "Chris Knight" <cknight@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:07:33 -0800
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Hedley wrote: >> More to the point, would those who purchased HTML Transit for $US500 >> before the price went up to $US5000 still recommend it? In a word: Yes However, I only used an early version of HTML Transit that lacks some of the features Hedley listed. What it did, it did VERY well, better than any other tool I have tried (I have used Webworks, but not the Pro edition). I make user docs and help systems, mainly for specialized telecom software. Transit is very elegant in its use of tags, and is extremely flexible and powerful. The version I used had no direct support for CSS, JavaScript, or XML, but you can specify conditions under which (arbitrary) text is added to the HTML generated. I did have one interchange with the developers about a bug I found. They seemed pretty good at what they are doing. Mind you, they didn't find the bug while we were talking back and forth over a few days. I have no idea if the current version fixed the bug, OR if it addresses more of Hedley's requirements. I had a tough enough time convincing my client to buy Transit at $US500 Personally, if I could buy it NOW for that, I would, in a flash. I would go so far as to say HTML Transit is the best application program I have ever used. But, it's just too costly now for an independent (A few months ago, I heard 10K, not 5, so perhaps they are climbing down a bit). Assuming that the product is still as good as what I saw (it's probably got more features by now), and if you can get the $, go for it. Christopher Knight, Technical Communicator E-mail: cknight@attcanada.ca Phone: (604) 877-0074 ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **