[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: framers@xxxxxxxxx, hedley_finger@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Single-sourcing: the possible dream? Mif2go, etc.
From: Larry Kollar <Larry.Kollar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:05:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3b25d7dc.3953965141@smtp.omsys.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Hedley Finger wrote: >How did you accommodate the terse topic-to-a-small-page style of on-line >help with the more discursive style for printed books? How did you design >the book pages so that the output has appropriate navigation: Next, >Previous, Back, Forward, To Contents, To Index, Help/Web Home, etc. This may be a topic better suited for techwr-l, but since I haven't subscribed to that list, I'll expound here. (IMO implied throughout.) If on-line content vs. printed content isn't a false dichotomy by now, it's rapidly going that way. Even in printed documentation, people are demanding brief, task-oriented manuals that address the job at hand. I haven't made a page count, but I suspect that the breakdown for our current product line documentation (approx. 4000 pages total) looks similar to this: 65% procedures 25% reference (command descriptions and so on) 10% discourse or explanatory material I think each of these needs its own presentation (style/format) and navigation aids, but I haven't nailed anything down yet. Navigation is a large subset of the total problem: - Some things are easy -- commands used in a procedure should link to the reference page for that command, for example. We could also move discussion material to its own page ("for more information") and link to it from the procedure. Linking to procedures you have to complete before starting this one is another no-brainer. - Other decisions could go either way -- do we back-link from a command reference page to any procedure that uses that command? Does each step deserve its own page, or do we put the entire procedure in a single file? How much discourse material do we put online, and where do we link into (and out) of it? Many of these navigation aids have print analogs, and we currently use very few of them. We too are looking toward a single-source future, and the more I think about it, the more I think we'll have to restructure our printed documentation as well. Fortunately, we're planning to do that anyway. Larry ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **