[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "'Ada Lai'" <adalai2000@xxxxxxxxx>, "'framers@xxxxxxxxx'" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Style Question
From: "Stevens, Ananda" <Ananda.Stevens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:47:39 -0500
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
> what character [do] you use to separate the multiple levels > of menu commands/options? Someone here used to use "Select Format | Document | Numbering". But when I started writing, I used > instead of |, without really thinking why. I suspect it's because the > seems more natural: - submenus are generally indicated by a triangle pointing to the right - submenus usually appear to the right of the main menu - the > reinforces the parent > child relationship of the main menu > submenu - the > indicates a redirect in UNIX, which isn't that far off the mark in a menu > submenu selection >From my bookshelf, some of the manuals that use the menu > submenu convention: - FrameMaker - IXgen - Photoshop - Kai's Power Tools - Illustrator - GoLive - Visio There is one book that does not use the > character, but it uses an arrow dingbat character. > Should we bite the bullet and adopt the verbal approach of > describing how to navigate the menus? Definitely _not_. As a user, I can get the information much quicker from the "main menu > submenu" shorthand notation than from a full sentence of "select the menu and then select the submenu"! Also, if you are reading a manual written in another language, the "menu > submenu" convention eliminates some confusion -- since some people will write "Select the submenu from the menu" rather than "select the menu and then the submenu". (Been there, done that with the kanji in the Japanese Windows9x installation... navigation by pattern recognition, anyone? ;-) HTH, Ananda Stevens ananda.stevens@windriver.com ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **