[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "'framers@xxxxxxxxx'" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: page numbering in software docs
From: Ada Lai <adalai2000@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:49:24 -0700
Cc: "'Ada Lai'" <adalai2000@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Hi, all... I was curious about opinions or common practice regarding the numbering of pages in technical documents produced by a vendor for their software. I work for a vendor that produces high-level software (i.e., for application developers and web developers, not consumer-level end users) and the doc suite includes design guides, reference manuals, installation manuals and some user guides. In the "old days" -- like two years ago ;-) -- the docs for this vendor had the page numbers restart with each chapter. However, they recently changed to consecutive page numbering throughout each doc. It's okay for some of the smaller docs, but some of the other docs are 400+ pages. As a former technical support person, I've been one of the users of these docs in the past and I think the large docs are harder to use now because of the consecutive numbering. However, I truthfully can't give you a good reason for that. Somehow, it just seems easier to find things in a large book when the pages are numbered chapter-wise, especially when you use the book frequently and have come to know it intimately. Since producing our latest set of docs, I have received feedback from users (tech support, QA, Engineering), that they also do not like the book-wide page numbering. However, other doc writers (and some of the MarComm folks) have argued that it is "dated" (i.e., old-fashioned) to number pages chapter-wise. Any opinions? Ada Lai __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **